D. Salinger moonlight when you find yourself a beneficial “bored stiff light pet” comes up, moves more, and you may hits their left-hand

A description of Seymour once the a physical entity nearly proves Pal’s undoing

/. Pal are the first so you’re able to admit that poems beat something-much -inside “interpretation by paraphrase.” Nevertheless the trend is clear: unsentimentalized slight minutes away from big lights otherwise epiphany; finely engraved vignettes which tell you the fresh new “religious mechanism” under the externals. As good critic, Seymour try represented using his reviews to your enough Pal’s tales, together with essence away from his advice was summed up in 2 concerns the guy tells Pal he’s going to getting expected since the a writer as he becomes deceased: “Was your primary stars aside? Was your busy writing their cardio away?” Although Seymour’s questions, eg their poems, may not become paraphrased, the guy seems to recommend that sense and you can impact -within their greatest sensory faculties -have to be employed in great creating; and also for the viewer it getting those people evasive, indefinable services that are significantly moving and you can lighting-up. When he moves through a catalogue of Seymour’s physical properties – hair, ears, attention, nose, sound, surface, outfits – the guy gets a growing number of intrusive and less defined, at times, seem to, painfully close disintegration (for example, he announces just after a quick passage on the Seymour’s ears, “I’m going to sleep. . . . Both hands is actually perspiration, new bowels churning. The newest Integrated Kid is not home”). “Seymour: An introduction” appears not so much a story as an assemblage regarding cards, observations, stories, and you can irrelevancies (“flowering parentheses”), comparable to Pal’s (or Salinger’s) diary, at which a narrative you are going to one day be manufactured. The new Seymour you to definitely is provided are consistent with the Seymour i came knowing currently; the fresh new issue is actually exhibited, brand new complexities shown, however, no really brand new dimensions are set in his portrait. In such a way, after that, the story is Pal’s, while we find your the very first time in every their misery from heart wanting to hold and you may 41

From the facts, recommendations are produced, such as for instance to your work you to definitely Buddy features authored, that force that it identity

reinforce his learn to the challenging truths lurking within the Seymour’s lifestyle. The guy appears for the eager necessity of her or him. The guy raises himself at the start, with irony, since an enthusiastic “ecstatically happier kid”; and at the conclusion, as he makes to go to classification, the guy realizes that “no thing” he really does was “more significant than simply going into you to definitely dreadful Space 307.” Since the Seymour shortly after said, “most of the we carry out our entire existence try move from one absolutely nothing piece of Holy Soil to another location.” “Seymour: An introduction” could be thought to feel the function that hides form, aided by the appearing irrelevancies on purpose built to manage a level more than typical impression out-of reality – the genuine fact (a technique, by the way, quite normal, as the experience Dostoevski’s “Cards out of Below ground” otherwise Rilke’s The notebook away from Malte Laurids Brigge). However,, nevertheless, there is certainly a lingering question in regards to the author’s manage, any doubt which is a little strengthened from the Pal’s recurrent resemblance to help you Salinger. One of Friend’s really works is in fact The latest Catcher on Rye, a few other people is “Improve Higher new Roof Beam, Carpenters” (in which Buddy was narrator) and you may “The best Big date having Bananafish” (and then he was not), whilst still being various other is “Teddy” (Friend even estimates from it). For example information since these although some do not, definitely, show things, nonetheless manage recommend – and simply strongly recommend faceflow-recensies – you to Salinger was discussing, yet not obliquely, his very own loss of handle and you will diffusion out-of talent. Salinger’s enough time quiet following look of “Seymour: An intro” from inside the 1959 is actually finished inside 1965 towards the publication of another part regarding the Cup saga, “Hapworth sixteen, 1924.” This story performed absolutely nothing to reassure individuals who expected an effective go back to the sooner excellence away from Catcher regarding Rye. Actually, it tended to complement people qualities of one’s afterwards works and that extremely website subscribers found disturbing- a boring size, a laughs tend to notice-knowingly sweet, a good muting away from narrative in support of philosophical asides. However in spite 42

Bir cevap yazın

E-posta hesabınız yayımlanmayacak. Gerekli alanlar * ile işaretlenmişlerdir